Day 1 · 18 min · Recognize

Distinguishing solitude from loneliness

The first step toward addressing loneliness is recognizing that it is not the same as being alone. Solitude can be chosen and nourishing. Loneliness is unwanted and painful.

Two different states

Weiss (1973) distinguished between emotional loneliness (the absence of a close intimate bond) and social loneliness (the absence of a sense of belonging to a group). Cacioppo and Hawkley (2009) showed that chronic loneliness — the subjective feeling — has measurable health effects comparable to smoking 15 cigarettes a day.

Yet many people who spend hours alone are not lonely — they have rich inner lives or simply enjoy their own company. Solitude becomes loneliness only when there is a discrepancy between the connection we want and the connection we have (Perlman & Peplau, 1981).

Today we distinguish. Tomorrow (Day 2) we map which kind of loneliness — emotional, social, or both — is present for you.

Practice — Solitude vs loneliness self-check

For each statement below, mark whether it resonates with your recent experience (this week or month):

  • ☐ I enjoy being alone for stretches of time (solitude)
  • ☐ I feel pain when I want to share something and have no one to share it with
  • ☐ I feel excluded from groups I would like to belong to
  • ☐ I have acquaintances but no one who really knows me
  • ☐ I feel "invisible" in social settings
  • ☐ I avoid reaching out because I assume others don't want to hear from me

The first statement indicates chosen solitude (not loneliness). The others point to emotional or social loneliness. There is no score; just notice which statements resonate most strongly.

References

  • Weiss RS. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation. MIT Press.
  • Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC. (2009). Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(10), 447-454. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.005
  • Perlman D, Peplau LA. (1981). Toward a social psychology of loneliness. Personal Relationships in Disorder, 31-56.